Depending on scope, we can assess:
Evaluate authentication, authorization, session management, input validation, business logic, security configuration, and other application-layer weaknesses.
Assess API authentication, authorization, object-level access, rate limiting, input handling, business logic, and exposed functionality.
Assess internet-facing systems, services, ports, configurations, and exploitable exposures.
Evaluate internal network security, access paths, service exposure, weak configurations, and potential attack paths.
Test from the perspective of a legitimate user or privileged account to uncover issues that may not be visible externally.
Validate selected security configurations, authentication mechanisms, access controls, and privilege boundaries where included in scope.
Define assets, URLs, APIs, IP ranges, accounts, environments, restrictions, testing windows, and objectives.
Understand the exposed attack surface and identify potential entry points.
Analyze technologies, services, endpoints, access paths, and application behavior.
Use a combination of manual techniques and appropriate tools to identify weaknesses.
Where safe and authorized, validate whether identified vulnerabilities can actually be exploited.
Understand what an attacker could realistically achieve.
Document technical findings, evidence, severity, impact, and practical remediation.
Retest remediated findings and confirm whether the identified weakness has been successfully addressed.
Broken Access Control
Authentication Weaknesses
Authorization Bypass
IDOR / BOLA
Injection Vulnerabilities
Cross-Site Scripting
Server-Side Request Forgery
Insecure File Handling
Security Misconfiguration
Weak Session Management
Sensitive Data Exposure
API Security Weaknesses
Business Logic Flaws
Privilege Escalation
Weak Network Services
Insecure Protocols
Exposed Administrative Interfaces
Default or Weak Credentials
Missing Security Controls
Other exploitable weaknesses identified during testing
Automated tools can detect patterns. Human testers understand context. They can ask:
That's where penetration testing goes beyond vulnerability scanning.
Many serious vulnerabilities only become visible after authentication.
Where included in scope, we test using provided user roles to evaluate:
Access boundaries
Role separation
Horizontal privilege escalation
Vertical privilege escalation
Sensitive functionality
Unauthorized data access
Business logic abuse
This provides a more realistic view of application and API security.
Not every finding has the same business impact.
We evaluate findings based on technical severity, exploitability, exposure, and potential impact.
Where appropriate, findings may include CVSS-based severity scoring alongside contextual risk information.
The result:
You know what is critical.
You know what can wait.
And your technical team knows what to fix.
Our penetration testing reports are designed to be useful, not decorative.
Typical reporting includes:
Executive Summary
A clear overview of the overall security posture, major risks, and key themes.
Technical Findings
Detailed information for technical teams.
Severity
Clear prioritization of each finding.
Evidence
Supporting screenshots, requests, responses, or technical evidence where appropriate.
Impact
What could happen if the vulnerability is exploited.
Remediation
Practical recommendations to address the issue.
References
Relevant technical references where useful.
Revalidation Status
Confirmation of remediation after retesting, when included.
Finding vulnerabilities is only useful if they get fixed.
That’s why our work can continue beyond the initial test through:
Remediation guidance
Technical clarification
Prioritization
Retesting
Closure validation
Vulnerability remediation support
Find it. Understand it. Fix it. Verify it.
We focus on exploitable risk, not simply generating large numbers of findings.
Our testing combines technical assessment, manual validation, business context, and clear reporting to help teams understand the real security impact.
And because our broader capabilities include governance, risk, compliance, audit, and remediation, we can help organizations connect technical findings to their wider cybersecurity program.
We use appropriate tools where useful, but penetration testing includes manual validation and testing. It is not simply an automated vulnerability scan.
Yes. Authenticated testing can be included when test accounts and required access are provided.
Yes. API penetration testing can be scoped separately or together with application testing.
Yes. We can retest findings after remediation and confirm their status.
Testing is performed within the agreed rules of engagement. Potentially disruptive activities are controlled based on the approved scope and environment.
Yes. Securelogx also provides vulnerability remediation support where required.
We care about the smallest details to make your facility safe.